Response to the Bulletin Post: 10 Unwritten Rules of Friendster
Sunday, January 8th, 2006Just this morning, I read a new post in friendster called 10 Unwritten Rules of Friendster. While some of the rules are pretty convincing, I have to say I vehemently disagree with the author’s way of expressing his/her thoughts. For those who want to read ad hominem arguments and agree with it, feel free. I, on the other hand, feel that what’s supposed to be 10 unwritten rules in friendster is more like 10 things that annoy the author. Besides, there’s no evidence to corroborate most of his/her arguments.
Without further ado, let’s start. Note: I type my opinions in boldface.
1. To the people who have like more
than 500 friends, are you serious? Nobody in this
universe has that many friends…you’re stupid and
desperate. Go kill yourself.
Speak for yourself, mate.
I won’t kill myself because I have 500 friends. Really, do you know every single person in the universe well enough to know that nobody has more than 500 friends? What if you’re, like me, a person who frequently travels, and stays for a given time, from one place to another? What if, in 20 years, you’ve studied in 3 different schools? What if you’re a leader of youth seminars? If such a person do not get to know more than 500 people, then heck, this world must really be underpopulated. Recent figure shows it’s not. To be honest, I know more than 500, or even 1000 people, yet I only have around 521 friends in my friendster account. Quite a bargain already, isn’t it?
Okay, granted, I do not know 500 people so well. In fact, I think people who I truly consider to be close friends amount to only around 20, or maybe even less. Friendster’s objective has never been merely about connecting with people who are close to the user. It’s also a place where you connect with your acquaintances and maybe meet up with new people (really depends on the purpose of why you’ve joined friendster. It varies among different people.) Now, it may not necessarily be true that all 500 people in a "FULL" friendster account are truly people whom one considers friends, so that’s where the user’s social skills are tested. To some people, most of the friends in their network are just figures: placed there to be an added weight. To others, however, most of the 500 count. In fact, I daresay that if it isn’t because of friendster, I wouldn’t have known acquaintances like Rache and Clarence better, and I wouldn’t even get a chance to meet someone like Seulki.
2. If you’re ugly stop acting like you don’t
know it. The captions under your picture that
say "Top Model Pose" doesn’t convince anybody.
At least work on your personality.
I have to agree on this one to an extent. However, I do not think that we should be too harsh in judging other’s beauty. Recall the tired cliche: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I’ve known people who look horrible in my eyes, yet they strike as a real eye catcher to others. Regarding putting a caption "Top Model Pose", well, it may be egotistical, but if that’s the user’s only means to boost his/her self esteem, then why should you smite him/her with this kind of statement? Besides, if the following quote makes you feel better, empty barrels make the most noise, right?
3. Don’t ever post pictures and say "omg im
so ugly" because if you were, you wouldn’t post
them. Please put the rod and reel away ‘coz your
just fishin’ for compliments.
It goes back to what I was saying to counter argument number 2. Face it: people have their different means to entertain themselves. If they are entertained with posting pictures while claiming those pictures to be their top model pose, why should we stop them when it harms no one? Similarly, if they want to call themselves ugly, well, let them! The ground where most friendster users stand in is a free country. This means, they have the freedom of their self-image.
4. Nobody cares about threats over the
internet. Don’t try to act hard with the
keyboard…that’s so sad. unless you actually
physically beat someone with the keyboard. Then
that would be ironically hilarious.
Okay, so I really agree with this one. But honestly, don’t you sound like you’re threatening users who do not abide by friendster’s unspoken rules?
5. If all your pictures look the same…don’t
post them all! Please put some variety in your
pics. Nobody wants to see your face 8 different
ways. I don’t care if its inverted, black and
white, or
faded out. A face is a face is a face.
You do not understand Photoshop, do you? It is the hobby of some to use different features of Photoshop to enhance images. Who knows, people who post multiple pictures of the same pose but with different image enhancements might actually be trying to impress jobhunters. Besides, isn’t there a "Jobs" feature in friendster?
6. Who really gives a rats ass if I don’t accept
you as a friend…MOVE ON. Don’t send me
another request or message asking "what’s up?" I
don’t want you as a friend or I just don’t care,
that’s
what’s up!
You could do well not to write in such an ad hominem manner such as using the word "rats ass". I agree with your statement, but you could’ve delivered it with more objectivity and less angst.
Beside, it’s "rat’s ass". If this is any consolation though, I feel like a jerk being a grammar police.
7. LITTLE 10, 11, 12, 13+ years old who have
friendster and LOOK LIKE SLUTS, go
somewhere else because NOBODY wants you
here except pedophiles, and is that what you want?
To be raped? No you don’t, so RUN FAST!!
Please show me pics of little "10, 11, 12 and 13+ years old" that "Look Like Sluts". Don’t get me wrong: I’m not a pedophile. It’s just that this argument of yours is so weak that I need to know who or what categorizes as "10, 11, 12, and 13 year olds" that look like sluts.
Besides, why deprive them of their entertainment if it harms no one? Who knows, they might be here to see what the fuzz is all about. Isn’t friendster the hottest thing on this side of the planet 2 years ago?
I’m speaking of the 10/11/12/13 year olds, of course.
8. No one is really going to die in 6 days or
have bad relationships for 5 years just because
they don’t pass your bulletin on. So stop saying
that!
I agree, but this statement has been made before. Do you check your e-mail? If this is the statement you’re trying to make then why don’t you just (re)post the "angst against chain letters" e-mail, which has been circulating around for a while, instead?
9. If you have decided to read this, you are a
true Friendster Friend. Real friends read their
bulletins.
I don’t know if I’m glad that you have made a sycophantic comment to people like me even just this once. Do you call people who flood 10-same-message-bulletins in the bulletin boards as "real friends"? And do you call people who open the 10-same-message-bulletins 10x "real friends" as well? I’m more inclined to think that those two kind of people need to get out more. Otherwise, friendster users who do read bulletin boards (that are not floods) : yeah, they are indeed true Friendster Friend in my book.
10. It serves to eliminate people who are
desperately trying to add "friends" like it’s a
popularity contest in high school. Good
riddance!
I’d love to make a post about techniques of people desperately trying to add "friends", except I think it would be full of ad hominem statements.
Like I said before, it’s their kind of entertainment! It’s their way of being complacent! What are we, police of some rules that are arbitrarily made? While I wouldn’t add them in a heartfelt way, sometimes it’s fun to give others a chance to know you. If they do reply to my messages, then that’s cool! If they don’t, well, you can always click on "delete", right? I don’t even know who is more high-school: people who add friends for popularity contest sake, or people who complain about people who add friends for popularity contest sake.
I don’t know why you’re so agitated about trifling issues such as this one.
This is a test to see how many people in your
friends list actually pay attention to you.
Copy and repost in your own bulletin as "10
UNWRITTEN RULES OF FRIENDSTER"
See, instead of merely reposting this in the bulletin board, I posted it in my blog. It’s much less evanescent, ephemeral, transient, fugacious and temporary. Do you love me now? :grins:
Probably not, seeing as to how I disagreed with many of your "rules". I have to give you credit though: your post was an interesting diversion.
Next. Time. However. Try. To. Be. A. Little. More. Objective.